LitmapsFree plan
Paid from
$12.5 a month
View plans and limitsUpdated 4 September 2026 · Independent comparison
Litmaps vs Scholarcy:
which should you use?
Litmaps and Scholarcy, side by side. Find the one that fits what you need to do.
Find your best fitThe 30-second answer
Litmaps is built for search, research & academics.
Scholarcy is built for search, research & academics.
Pricing, simplified
Start free. Upgrade when you need more.
ScholarcyFree plan
Paid from
$9.99 a month
View plans and limitsThe 30-second comparison
If you only read one section, make it this one. Rows where both sides say the same thing are left out — the point is where they differ. Where each row came from is listed underneath.
| Category | Litmaps | Scholarcy | Better fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it's built for | Draws a citation map you can steer, so the shape of a literature becomes visible rather than being a list of titles. | Breaks a paper into structured cards — aims, method, findings, limitations — instead of one block of summary, which makes skimming a stack of them practical. | Tie |
| Free plan | Yes. Free, capped rather than trial-limited: 2 Litmaps with 100 articles per map, basic search taking up to 20 seed inputs, monthly literature alerts and no collaboration | Yes. Free Article Summarizer: imports a range of file formats but stops at 10 summaries, and exports flashcards only one at a time | Tie |
| Cheapest way to pay | $12.5 a month. | $9.99 a month. | Scholarcy |
| What the paid tiers cost |
|
| Tie |
| What to watch out for | A map is a prompt to read, not a substitute for reading. The free tier stops at 2 maps of 100 articles each, so a real review needs Pro, and Pro is priced on separate education and commercial tabs. Overlaps ResearchRabbit, which is now the same company. | Structure comes from the paper being conventionally written; it copes badly with anything that is not. The free tier stops at 10 summaries, so a reading list of any size needs the paid plan. | Tie |
| Who it is usually for | researchers, students | students, researchers | Tie |
| Made by | Litmaps — Wellington, NZ. | Scholarcy — London, GB. | Tie |
Scholarcy is ahead on 1 of the 7 rows compared — cheapest way to pay — and it is not about how well it does the job. On fitness for the work, it and Litmaps are level. Treat this as a tiebreaker, not a recommendation.
Scholarcy
Breaks a paper into structured cards — aims, method, findings, limitations — instead of one block of summary, which makes skimming a stack of them practical.
✓ Breaks a paper into structured cards — aims, method, findings, limitations — instead of one block of summary, which makes skimming a stack of them practical.
✓ You want the cheaper paid plan, $9.99 against $12.5
✓ It is built for search, research & academics
✓ Free Article Summarizer: imports a range of file formats but stops at 10 summaries, and exports flashcards only one at a time
Draws a citation map you can steer, so the shape of a literature becomes visible rather than being a list of titles.
Litmaps is the better answer when the job is what it was built for rather than what the pick above does broadly.
✓ Draws a citation map you can steer, so the shape of a literature becomes visible rather than being a list of titles.
✓ It is built for search, research & academics
✓ Free, capped rather than trial-limited: 2 Litmaps with 100 articles per map, basic search taking up to 20 seed inputs, monthly literature alerts and no collaboration
✓ It is aimed at researchers, students
How we know
Every row that separated these two, and where it came from. Nothing here is a hands-on test — if a line rests on a vendor’s own pricing page, it says so and links it.
| Row | Favours | Weight | Where it came from |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cheapest way to pay | Scholarcy | Everything else | From each vendor’s own pricing page. Dates and pages are listed below. |
The prices
Litmaps. Read by hand off litmaps.com on 4 September 2026. It is not on the monthly re-check, so confirm there before paying. litmaps.com/pricing
Scholarcy. Read by hand on 4 September 2026, because Scholarcy cannot be read automatically: www.scholarcy.com refuses automation (403) on both its pricing page and the alternate. Plans transcribed by hand from the pricing page; re-verify the same way. scholarcy.com/pricing
The ratings
The category these two share. Search, Research & Academics — both are listed there in the catalogue, and the fit recorded against each listing is a judgement made here, by hand.
The nine-category grid below. Derived from what each product is listed for, by one script, once per build — so the same pair always reads the same. It is a derivation, not a review.
What this is not
Neither product was run side by side to produce this page. Nobody was paid to appear on it and nothing here is ranked by commission.
To put the same question to both and read the answers yourself, run them side by side — that is a live test, and this is not.
Choose based on what you’re doing
All ten categories, including the ones where neither of these is the answer. These ratings are derived from what each product is listed for, not from running it — a rating here is a reading of the record, and the record is linked.
01
General-Purpose AI Assistants
Questions, brainstorming, explanations, everyday tasks, decision-making, general advice.
Litmaps
Not a good fitScholarcy
Not a good fitBest choice: Neither
02
Search, Research & Academics
Web research, deep research, books, academic papers, citations, news, fact-checking.
Litmaps
Built for thisScholarcy
Built for thisBest choice: Tie
03
Writing, Communication & Language
Emails, reports, essays, editing, summarizing, translation, presentations.
Litmaps
Not a good fitScholarcy
Not a good fitBest choice: Neither
04
Coding, Data & Technical Work
Programming, debugging, data analysis, spreadsheets, math, engineering, technical research.
Litmaps
Bad fitScholarcy
Bad fitBest choice: Neither
05
Business, Finance & Professional Work
Business strategy, investing, market research, legal, sales, HR, accounting, consulting.
Litmaps
Not a good fitScholarcy
Not a good fitBest choice: Neither
06
Image & Design
Image generation, photo editing, logos, graphics, product design, advertising creatives.
Litmaps
Bad fitScholarcy
Bad fitBest choice: Neither
07
Video
Video generation and editing, clipping, subtitles, avatars, animation and motion capture.
Litmaps
Bad fitScholarcy
Bad fitBest choice: Neither
08
Audio, Voice & Music
Voice generation, transcription, music, dubbing, sound cleanup and podcast production.
Litmaps
Bad fitScholarcy
Bad fitBest choice: Neither
09
Marketing & Content Creation
Social media, SEO, advertising, copywriting, content ideas, scripts, brand development.
Litmaps
Bad fitScholarcy
Bad fitBest choice: Neither
10
Productivity, Automation & Personal Life
AI agents, workflows, scheduling, meetings, organization, shopping, travel, personal finance.
Litmaps
Not a good fitScholarcy
Not a good fitBest choice: Neither
Draws a citation map you can steer, so the shape of a literature becomes visible rather than being a list of titles.
Wellington, NZDraws a citation map you can steer, so the shape of a literature becomes visible rather than being a list of titles.
It is built for search, research & academics
Free, capped rather than trial-limited: 2 Litmaps with 100 articles per map, basic search taking up to 20 seed inputs, monthly literature alerts and no collaboration
It is aimed at researchers, students
Breaks a paper into structured cards — aims, method, findings, limitations — instead of one block of summary, which makes skimming a stack of them practical.
London, GBBreaks a paper into structured cards — aims, method, findings, limitations — instead of one block of summary, which makes skimming a stack of them practical.
You want the cheaper paid plan, $9.99 against $12.5
It is built for search, research & academics
Free Article Summarizer: imports a range of file formats but stops at 10 summaries, and exports flashcards only one at a time
Pricing, simplified
The plans people actually compare, read from each vendor’s own page.
PricingSimple, up-to-date plan overview.
Free version
Litmaps
Yes — Free plan availableFree, capped rather than trial-limited: 2 Litmaps with 100 articles per map, basic search
Scholarcy
Yes — Free plan availableFree Article Summarizer: imports a range of file formats but stops at 10 summaries, and exports
Individual plans
Litmaps
Pro
$12.50 / month$10 / month (annual)
Scholarcy
Scholarcy Plus
$9.99 / month$7.50 / month (annual)
Business plans
Litmaps
Custom pricingTeam
ScholarcyNot sold to teams
Enterprise
LitmapsNot published
ScholarcyNot published
Tell us what you use AI for
Pick your main job and the verdict below changes to match. Every answer is on the page already, so this works as a reader, not a lookup.
The verdict for that job
Evenly matched
Close call. Both cover search, research & academics at the same level; both have a free plan you can start on; Scholarcy is cheaper to start paying for, $9.99 against $12.5.
7 rows compared
Frequently asked questions
Is Litmaps or Scholarcy better?
Scholarcy is ahead on 1 of the 7 rows compared — cheapest way to pay — and it is not about how well it does the job. On fitness for the work, it and Litmaps are level. Treat this as a tiebreaker, not a recommendation. both have a free plan you can start on; Scholarcy is cheaper to start paying for, $9.99 against $12.5. Litmaps: Draws a citation map you can steer, so the shape of a literature becomes visible rather than being a list of titles. Scholarcy: Breaks a paper into structured cards — aims, method, findings, limitations — instead of one block of summary, which makes skimming a stack of them practical.
Is Litmaps or Scholarcy cheaper?
Scholarcy — paid plans start at $9.99 a month against $12.5 a month.
Do Litmaps and Scholarcy both have free plans?
Yes. Litmaps: Free, capped rather than trial-limited: 2 Litmaps with 100 articles per map, basic search taking up to 20 seed inputs, monthly literature alerts and no collaboration. Scholarcy: Free Article Summarizer: imports a range of file formats but stops at 10 summaries, and exports flashcards only one at a time.
What should I watch out for?
Litmaps: A map is a prompt to read, not a substitute for reading. The free tier stops at 2 maps of 100 articles each, so a real review needs Pro, and Pro is priced on separate education and commercial tabs. Overlaps ResearchRabbit, which is now the same company. Scholarcy: Structure comes from the paper being conventionally written; it copes badly with anything that is not. The free tier stops at 10 summaries, so a reading list of any size needs the paid plan.
Read more
Litmaps
What it is for, who makes it, what it costs and what to use instead.
Scholarcy
What it is for, who makes it, what it costs and what to use instead.
Best AI for Research
Web research, deep research, books, academic papers, citations, news, fact-checking.