Right AI for the Job
Home › Tools › Augment Code vs Qwen
Updated 4 September 2026 · Independent comparison

Augment Code vs Qwen:
which should you use?

Augment Code and Qwen, side by side. Find the one that fits what you need to do.

Find your best fit

The 30-second answer

Augment Code built for codebases large enough that context is the whole problem, and it indexes the repository rather than reading files on demand. Qwen ships Coder builds trained for code specifically, up to 480B, and they are downloadable like the rest of the family.

Pricing, simplified

Start free. Upgrade when you need more.

1 of 2 have a free plan 0 of 2 prices re-read automatically · how we know No paid placement

The 30-second comparison

If you only read one section, make it this one. Rows where both sides say the same thing are left out — the point is where they differ. Where each row came from is listed underneath.

Augment Code and Qwen side by side, with the better fit for each row.
CategoryAugment CodeQwenBetter fit
What it's built forBuilt for codebases large enough that context is the whole problem, and it indexes the repository rather than reading files on demand.Ships Coder builds trained for code specifically, up to 480B, and they are downloadable like the rest of the family.Tie
Free planNo. Paid from the start.Yes. Free to use, weights downloadableQwen
Cheapest way to pay$20 a month.No paid tier — it is free.Qwen
What the paid tiers cost
  • One person, from $20/month
  • Per seat, from $100/month
  • Enterprise, priced on request
No paid tier — it is free.Tie
What to watch out forIndividual plans were retired in 2026, so the entry price is a team one — flat, not per seat, which makes it unusually cheap per head on a large team. What you buy is a usage allowance rather than seats: $20 buys $20 of it, and anything beyond is topped up pay as you go. Inline completions were removed from the cheaper tiers first.The coding editors most developers use do not ship with it selected; you are wiring it up yourself or self-hosting.Tie
Who it is usually fordevelopersGeneral use.Tie
Runs on your own machineHosted service only — your material goes to their servers.Can be run on your own machine, so the material never leaves it.Qwen
Made byAugment Computing — Palo Alto, US.Alibaba Qwen — Hangzhou, CN.Tie

Qwen is ahead on 3 of the 8 rows compared, 2 of them about how well it does the job itself. That is a clear lead rather than a tiebreaker.

Overall pick

Qwen

Ships Coder builds trained for code specifically, up to 480B, and they are downloadable like the rest of the family.

✓ Ships Coder builds trained for code specifically, up to 480B, and they are downloadable like the rest of the family. ✓ You want to start without paying anything ✓ You would rather not take on a subscription at all ✓ The material cannot leave your own machine
Choose Augment Code instead if…

Built for codebases large enough that context is the whole problem, and it indexes the repository rather than reading files on demand.

Augment Code is the better answer when the job is what it was built for rather than what the pick above does broadly.

✓ Built for codebases large enough that context is the whole problem, and it indexes the repository rather than reading files on demand. ✓ You are among developers ✓ It is aimed at developers ✓ Paid plans start at $20 a month

How we know

Every row that separated these two, and where it came from. Nothing here is a hands-on test — if a line rests on a vendor’s own pricing page, it says so and links it.

The 3 rows that decided this page, with the source for each.
RowFavoursWeightWhere it came from
Free planQwenHow well it does the jobFrom each vendor’s own pricing page. Dates and pages are listed below.
Cheapest way to payQwenEverything elseFrom each vendor’s own pricing page. Dates and pages are listed below.
Runs on your own machineQwenHow well it does the jobFrom this site’s own catalogue record for each product — compiled by hand, not imported. How a product gets listed

The prices

Augment Code. Read by hand off augmentcode.com on 4 September 2026. It is not on the monthly re-check, so confirm there before paying. augmentcode.com/pricing

Qwen. Read by hand off chat.qwen.ai on 4 September 2026. It is not on the monthly re-check, so confirm there before paying. chat.qwen.ai/pricing

The ratings

The category these two share. Coding, Data & Technical Work — both are listed there in the catalogue, and the fit recorded against each listing is a judgement made here, by hand.

The nine-category grid below. Derived from what each product is listed for, by one script, once per build — so the same pair always reads the same. It is a derivation, not a review.

What this is not

Neither product was run side by side to produce this page. Nobody was paid to appear on it and nothing here is ranked by commission.

To put the same question to both and read the answers yourself, run them side by side — that is a live test, and this is not.

Choose based on what you’re doing

All ten categories, including the ones where neither of these is the answer. These ratings are derived from what each product is listed for, not from running it — a rating here is a reading of the record, and the record is linked.

01

General-Purpose AI Assistants

Questions, brainstorming, explanations, everyday tasks, decision-making, general advice.

Augment Code
Not a good fit
Qwen
Good fit
Best choice: Qwen
02

Search, Research & Academics

Web research, deep research, books, academic papers, citations, news, fact-checking.

Augment Code
Bad fit
Qwen
Limited fit
Best choice: Qwen
03

Writing, Communication & Language

Emails, reports, essays, editing, summarizing, translation, presentations.

Augment Code
Bad fit
Qwen
Good fit
Best choice: Qwen
04

Coding, Data & Technical Work

Programming, debugging, data analysis, spreadsheets, math, engineering, technical research.

Augment Code
Good fit
Qwen
Limited fit
Best choice: Augment Code
05

Business, Finance & Professional Work

Business strategy, investing, market research, legal, sales, HR, accounting, consulting.

Augment Code
Not a good fit
Qwen
Limited fit
Best choice: Qwen
06

Image & Design

Image generation, photo editing, logos, graphics, product design, advertising creatives.

Augment Code
Bad fit
Qwen
Bad fit
Best choice: Neither
07

Video

Video generation and editing, clipping, subtitles, avatars, animation and motion capture.

Augment Code
Bad fit
Qwen
Bad fit
Best choice: Neither
08

Audio, Voice & Music

Voice generation, transcription, music, dubbing, sound cleanup and podcast production.

Augment Code
Bad fit
Qwen
Bad fit
Best choice: Neither
09

Marketing & Content Creation

Social media, SEO, advertising, copywriting, content ideas, scripts, brand development.

Augment Code
Bad fit
Qwen
Limited fit
Best choice: Qwen
10

Productivity, Automation & Personal Life

AI agents, workflows, scheduling, meetings, organization, shopping, travel, personal finance.

Augment Code
Not a good fit
Qwen
Limited fit
Best choice: Qwen
Pick Augment Code if

Built for codebases large enough that context is the whole problem, and it indexes the repository rather than reading files on demand.

by Augment Computing
Built for codebases large enough that context is the whole problem, and it indexes the repository rather than reading files on demand.
You are among developers
It is aimed at developers
Paid plans start at $20 a month
Pick Qwen if

Ships Coder builds trained for code specifically, up to 480B, and they are downloadable like the rest of the family.

by Alibaba Qwen
Ships Coder builds trained for code specifically, up to 480B, and they are downloadable like the rest of the family.
You want to start without paying anything
You would rather not take on a subscription at all
The material cannot leave your own machine

Pricing, simplified

The plans people actually compare, read from each vendor’s own page.

PricingSimple, up-to-date plan overview.
Augment Codeby Augment Computing
Qwenby Alibaba Qwen
Free version
Augment Code
No — paid from the startPaid from the start
Qwen
Yes — Free plan availableFree to use, weights downloadable
Individual plans
Augment Code
Standard $20 / month
QwenFree plan only
Business plans
Augment Code
From $100 / user / month
QwenNot sold to teams
Enterprise
Augment Code
Custom pricing
QwenNot published
View full details
Augment CodeView Augment Code pricing
QwenView Qwen pricing
Interactive

Tell us what you use AI for

Pick your main job and the verdict below changes to match. Every answer is on the page already, so this works as a reader, not a lookup.

The verdict for that job
Qwen
Close call. Both cover coding, data & technical work at the same level; only Qwen has a free plan.
8 rows compared

Frequently asked questions

Is Augment Code or Qwen better?

Qwen is ahead on 3 of the 8 rows compared, 2 of them about how well it does the job itself. That is a clear lead rather than a tiebreaker. only Qwen has a free plan. Augment Code: Built for codebases large enough that context is the whole problem, and it indexes the repository rather than reading files on demand. Qwen: Ships Coder builds trained for code specifically, up to 480B, and they are downloadable like the rest of the family.

Is Augment Code or Qwen cheaper?

Only one of the two publishes a ladder we have verified, so a like-for-like comparison is not possible yet.

Do Augment Code and Qwen both have free plans?

Qwen does — Free to use, weights downloadable. Augment Code does not.

What should I watch out for?

Augment Code: Individual plans were retired in 2026, so the entry price is a team one — flat, not per seat, which makes it unusually cheap per head on a large team. What you buy is a usage allowance rather than seats: $20 buys $20 of it, and anything beyond is topped up pay as you go. Inline completions were removed from the cheaper tiers first. Qwen: The coding editors most developers use do not ship with it selected; you are wiring it up yourself or self-hosting.

Read more

Augment Code

What it is for, who makes it, what it costs and what to use instead.

Qwen

What it is for, who makes it, what it costs and what to use instead.

Best AI for Coding

Programming, debugging, data analysis, spreadsheets, math, engineering, technical research.

How we compare AI tools
Every row is generated from the same record the rest of the site is built on, so this page cannot drift from what we say elsewhere. We separate winner, tie and depends rather than forcing each category into a ranking, and we drop rows where both sides say the same thing. A pick is only called an overall pick when it leads on rows about how well the tool does the job; a lead that rests on price or audience alone is labelled as one. Nothing here is a hands-on test — how we know lists the source and date behind every deciding row.