$8 a month
View plans and limitsChatGPT vs Qwen:
which should you use?
ChatGPT and Qwen, side by side. Find the one that fits what you need to do.
Find your best fitThe 30-second answer
Pricing, simplified
Start free. Upgrade when you need more.
No verified ladder yet
View plans and limitsThe 30-second comparison
If you only read one section, make it this one. Rows where both sides say the same thing are left out — the point is where they differ. Where each row came from is listed underneath.
| Category | ChatGPT | Qwen | Better fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it's built for | The broadest feature set — voice, images, files, a large app ecosystem. Usually the easiest starting point. | One of the most downloaded open-weight families in the world, with excellent multilingual coverage. | ChatGPT |
| Fit for general-purpose ai assistants | Built for this | Strong fit | ChatGPT |
| Fit for writing, communication & language | Built for this | Strong fit | ChatGPT |
| Fit for coding, data & technical work | Built for this | Strong fit | ChatGPT |
| Fit for business, finance & professional work | Built for this | Strong fit | ChatGPT |
| Fit for marketing & content creation | Built for this | Strong fit | ChatGPT |
| Fit for productivity, automation & personal life | Built for this | Strong fit | ChatGPT |
| Free plan | Yes. Free tier, ad supported; unlimited everyday text chats, limited image creation, memory and voice | Yes. Free to use, weights downloadable | Tie |
| Cheapest way to pay | $8 a month. | No paid tier — it is free. | Qwen |
| What the paid tiers cost |
| No paid tier — it is free. | Tie |
| What to watch out for | Check your data settings. On consumer tiers conversations may be used to improve models unless you turn that off. | Best used self-hosted or through a third party if data handling matters. | Tie |
| Who it is usually for | students, working professionals, people exploring, developers | developers | Tie |
| Runs on your own machine | Hosted service only — your material goes to their servers. | Can be run on your own machine, so the material never leaves it. | Qwen |
| What it asks of you | No setup — it works in a browser. | Expects some technical comfort to get going. | Tie |
| Made by | OpenAI — San Francisco, US. | Alibaba Qwen — Hangzhou, CN. | Tie |
ChatGPT is ahead on 7 of the 15 rows compared, 6 of them about how well it does the job itself, against 2 to Qwen. That is a clear lead rather than a tiebreaker.
ChatGPT
The broadest feature set — voice, images, files, a large app ecosystem.
One of the most downloaded open-weight families in the world, with excellent multilingual coverage.
Qwen is the better answer when the job is what it was built for rather than what the pick above does broadly.
How we know
Every row that separated these two, and where it came from. Nothing here is a hands-on test — if a line rests on a vendor’s own pricing page, it says so and links it.
| Row | Favours | Weight | Where it came from |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it's built for | ChatGPT | How well it does the job | From this site’s own catalogue record for each product — compiled by hand, not imported. How a product gets listed |
| Fit for general-purpose ai assistants | ChatGPT | How well it does the job | Both products are listed under general-purpose ai assistants in the catalogue, and this is the fit recorded against each listing. Everything listed under general-purpose ai assistants |
| Fit for writing, communication & language | ChatGPT | How well it does the job | Both products are listed under writing, communication & language in the catalogue, and this is the fit recorded against each listing. Everything listed under writing, communication & language |
| Fit for coding, data & technical work | ChatGPT | How well it does the job | Both products are listed under coding, data & technical work in the catalogue, and this is the fit recorded against each listing. Everything listed under coding, data & technical work |
| Fit for business, finance & professional work | ChatGPT | How well it does the job | Both products are listed under business, finance & professional work in the catalogue, and this is the fit recorded against each listing. Everything listed under business, finance & professional work |
| Fit for marketing & content creation | ChatGPT | How well it does the job | Both products are listed under marketing & content creation in the catalogue, and this is the fit recorded against each listing. Everything listed under marketing & content creation |
| Fit for productivity, automation & personal life | ChatGPT | How well it does the job | Both products are listed under productivity, automation & personal life in the catalogue, and this is the fit recorded against each listing. Everything listed under productivity, automation & personal life |
| Cheapest way to pay | Qwen | Everything else | From each vendor’s own pricing page. Dates and pages are listed below. |
| Runs on your own machine | Qwen | How well it does the job | From this site’s own catalogue record for each product — compiled by hand, not imported. How a product gets listed |
The prices
ChatGPT. Read by hand on 4 September 2026, because ChatGPT cannot be read automatically: chatgpt.com refuses automation (403); openai.com/chatgpt/pricing carried no readable prices. Verify by hand. chatgpt.com/pricing
Qwen. Read by hand off chat.qwen.ai on 4 September 2026. It is not on the monthly re-check, so confirm there before paying. chat.qwen.ai/pricing
The ratings
The categories these two share. General-Purpose AI Assistants, Writing, Communication & Language, Coding, Data & Technical Work, Business, Finance & Professional Work, Marketing & Content Creation, Productivity, Automation & Personal Life — both are listed there in the catalogue, and the fit recorded against each listing is a judgement made here, by hand.
The nine-category grid below. Derived from what each product is listed for, by one script, once per build — so the same pair always reads the same. It is a derivation, not a review.
What this is not
Neither product was run side by side to produce this page. Nobody was paid to appear on it and nothing here is ranked by commission.
To put the same question to both and read the answers yourself, run them side by side — that is a live test, and this is not.
Choose based on what you’re doing
All ten categories, including the ones where neither of these is the answer. These ratings are derived from what each product is listed for, not from running it — a rating here is a reading of the record, and the record is linked.
General-Purpose AI Assistants
Questions, brainstorming, explanations, everyday tasks, decision-making, general advice.
Search, Research & Academics
Web research, deep research, books, academic papers, citations, news, fact-checking.
Writing, Communication & Language
Emails, reports, essays, editing, summarizing, translation, presentations.
Coding, Data & Technical Work
Programming, debugging, data analysis, spreadsheets, math, engineering, technical research.
Business, Finance & Professional Work
Business strategy, investing, market research, legal, sales, HR, accounting, consulting.
Image & Design
Image generation, photo editing, logos, graphics, product design, advertising creatives.
Video
Video generation and editing, clipping, subtitles, avatars, animation and motion capture.
Audio, Voice & Music
Voice generation, transcription, music, dubbing, sound cleanup and podcast production.
Marketing & Content Creation
Social media, SEO, advertising, copywriting, content ideas, scripts, brand development.
Productivity, Automation & Personal Life
AI agents, workflows, scheduling, meetings, organization, shopping, travel, personal finance.
The broadest feature set — voice, images, files, a large app ecosystem.
by OpenAIOne of the most downloaded open-weight families in the world, with excellent multilingual coverage.
by Alibaba QwenPricing, simplified
The plans people actually compare, read from each vendor’s own page.
Tell us what you use AI for
Pick your main job and the verdict below changes to match. Every answer is on the page already, so this works as a reader, not a lookup.
Frequently asked questions
Is ChatGPT or Qwen better?
ChatGPT is ahead on 7 of the 15 rows compared, 6 of them about how well it does the job itself, against 2 to Qwen. That is a clear lead rather than a tiebreaker. ChatGPT is built for general-purpose ai assistants; Qwen does it well without it being its focus; both have a free plan you can start on. ChatGPT: The broadest feature set — voice, images, files, a large app ecosystem. Usually the easiest starting point. Qwen: One of the most downloaded open-weight families in the world, with excellent multilingual coverage.
Is ChatGPT or Qwen cheaper?
Only one of the two publishes a ladder we have verified, so a like-for-like comparison is not possible yet.
Do ChatGPT and Qwen both have free plans?
Yes. ChatGPT: Free tier, ad supported; unlimited everyday text chats, limited image creation, memory and voice. Qwen: Free to use, weights downloadable.
What should I watch out for?
ChatGPT: Check your data settings. On consumer tiers conversations may be used to improve models unless you turn that off. Qwen: Best used self-hosted or through a third party if data handling matters.
Read more
What it is for, who makes it, what it costs and what to use instead.
What it is for, who makes it, what it costs and what to use instead.
Questions, brainstorming, explanations, everyday tasks, decision-making, general advice.
Emails, reports, essays, editing, summarizing, translation, presentations.
Programming, debugging, data analysis, spreadsheets, math, engineering, technical research.
Business strategy, investing, market research, legal, sales, HR, accounting, consulting.
Social media, SEO, advertising, copywriting, content ideas, scripts, brand development.
AI agents, workflows, scheduling, meetings, organization, shopping, travel, personal finance.