Consensus
Searches published papers and tells you how many of them support a claim, which turns a yes-or-no question into a count you can inspect.
Searches published papers and tells you how many of them support a claim, which turns a yes-or-no question into a count you can inspect.
The categories Consensus is listed in, and how strong a fit it is in each.
Web research, deep research, books, academic papers, citations, news, fact-checking.
Consensus has a free plan. Free plan at $0: basic paper search, 15 Pro messages a month and up to 3 Deep reviews a month, though the same card also describes the free tier as being without AI analysis
Answers are built from published papers rather than the open web, which is the distinction that matters when a claim has to survive a supervisor.
Tools that do comparable work, best fit first, drawn from the catalogue rather than hand-picked. Every one is listed whether or not there is money in it for us.
Builds a similarity graph from citation data rather than from a language model, so nothing in the output is generated and there is nothing to hallucinate.
View Connected Papers →Searches actual papers and extracts findings into a table you can check, one row per study, rather than answering in prose.
View Elicit →Scoped to clinical evidence and built with practising clinicians, so the filters match how medical literature is actually appraised.
View EvidenceHunt →Runs a multi-step search across dozens of sources and returns a structured, referenced report. Strong first pass on an unfamiliar field.
View Gemini Deep Research →You upload the sources and it answers only from them, linking every sentence to the passage it came from. The strongest verification pattern here.
View Gemini Notebook →Draws a citation map you can steer, so the shape of a literature becomes visible rather than being a list of titles.
View Litmaps →Where Consensus sits in the wider category pages.
Built for this — Web research, deep research, books, academic papers, citations, news, fact-checking.
Yes โ Free plan at $0: basic paper search, 15 Pro messages a month and up to 3 Deep reviews a month, though the same card also describes the free tier as being without AI analysis. The cheapest paid tier is Pro, at $20/mo month to month or $12/mo billed yearly.
Searches published papers and tells you how many of them support a claim, which turns a yes-or-no question into a count you can inspect. It is listed under Search, Research & Academics, and this is what it is built for.
The consensus meter reflects the papers it found, not the state of the field. Deep reviews are the metered resource โ 3 a month free, 15 on Pro, 200 on Deep โ so that is what decides the tier rather than how much you search.
6 tools do comparable work: Connected Papers, Elicit, EvidenceHunt, Gemini Deep Research, Gemini Notebook, Litmaps. 6 of them have a free plan.
Checked by hand on 4 September 2026, because Consensus cannot be read automatically: Both consensus.app/pricing/ and the help-centre article return 200 with the plans drawn in JavaScript; the browser step found no amounts either. Runs 16, 17, 19 and 20 all agree. Priced by hand from the in-app upgrade panel, which is where the Individual plans are actually shown; the Team and Enterprise tab is still uncovered. Prices change often โ confirm on the provider's own page before spending.