EvidenceHunt
Scoped to clinical evidence and built with practising clinicians, so the filters match how medical literature is actually appraised.
Scoped to clinical evidence and built with practising clinicians, so the filters match how medical literature is actually appraised.
The categories EvidenceHunt is listed in, and how strong a fit it is in each.
Web research, deep research, books, academic papers, citations, news, fact-checking.
EvidenceHunt has a free plan. Basic plan, free: unlimited questions on the low-cost models plus 3 PRO-quality questions, with chat history
Founded by a group including practising clinicians, and scoped to medical evidence rather than to research in general.
Tools that do comparable work, best fit first, drawn from the catalogue rather than hand-picked. Every one is listed whether or not there is money in it for us.
Builds a similarity graph from citation data rather than from a language model, so nothing in the output is generated and there is nothing to hallucinate.
View Connected Papers →Searches published papers and tells you how many of them support a claim, which turns a yes-or-no question into a count you can inspect.
View Consensus →Searches actual papers and extracts findings into a table you can check, one row per study, rather than answering in prose.
View Elicit →Runs a multi-step search across dozens of sources and returns a structured, referenced report. Strong first pass on an unfamiliar field.
View Gemini Deep Research →You upload the sources and it answers only from them, linking every sentence to the passage it came from. The strongest verification pattern here.
View Gemini Notebook →Draws a citation map you can steer, so the shape of a literature becomes visible rather than being a list of titles.
View Litmaps →Where EvidenceHunt sits in the wider category pages.
Built for this — Web research, deep research, books, academic papers, citations, news, fact-checking.
Yes — Basic plan, free: unlimited questions on the low-cost models plus 3 PRO-quality questions, with chat history. The cheapest paid tier is Pro.
Scoped to clinical evidence and built with practising clinicians, so the filters match how medical literature is actually appraised. It is listed under Search, Research & Academics, and this is what it is built for.
Medicine only, and no use for research in any other field. It prices in euros rather than dollars, and the free tier gives you 3 PRO-quality questions before dropping you to the low-cost models.
6 tools do comparable work: Connected Papers, Consensus, Elicit, Gemini Deep Research, Gemini Notebook, Litmaps. 6 of them have a free plan.
Checked by hand on 4 September 2026. Prices change often — confirm on the provider's own page before spending.