Right AI for the Job
Home › Tools › Connected Papers vs EvidenceHunt
Updated 4 September 2026 · Independent comparison

Connected Papers vs EvidenceHunt:
which should you use?

Connected Papers and EvidenceHunt, side by side. Find the one that fits what you need to do.

Find your best fit

The 30-second answer

Connected Papers is built for search, research & academics. EvidenceHunt is built for search, research & academics.

Pricing, simplified

Start free. Upgrade when you need more.

2 of 2 have a free plan 0 of 2 prices re-read automatically · how we know No paid placement

The 30-second comparison

If you only read one section, make it this one. Rows where both sides say the same thing are left out — the point is where they differ. Where each row came from is listed underneath.

Connected Papers and EvidenceHunt side by side, with the better fit for each row.
CategoryConnected PapersEvidenceHuntBetter fit
What it's built forBuilds a similarity graph from citation data rather than from a language model, so nothing in the output is generated and there is nothing to hallucinate.Scoped to clinical evidence and built with practising clinicians, so the filters match how medical literature is actually appraised.Tie
Free planYes. Free plan at $0: 5 graphs a month, with all features includedYes. Basic plan, free: unlimited questions on the low-cost models plus 3 PRO-quality questions, with chat historyTie
Cheapest way to pay$10 a month.No verified ladder yet.Tie
What the paid tiers cost
  • One person, from $10/month billed quarterly
  • Per seat, from $30/month billed quarterly
  • One person, from priced on request
  • Per seat, from priced on request
Tie
What to watch out forIt finds neighbours of one seed paper, so a bad starting point gives a confidently wrong map. The free tier is 5 graphs a month with every feature included, so paying buys volume rather than capability, and there is no monthly option — billing is annual or quarterly.Medicine only, and no use for research in any other field. It prices in euros rather than dollars, and the free tier gives you 3 PRO-quality questions before dropping you to the low-cost models.Tie
Who it is usually forresearchers, studentsresearchersTie
Sources you can checkAnswers arrive without sources attached.Answers carry sources you can open and check.EvidenceHunt
Made byConnected Papers — Tel Aviv, IL.EvidenceHunt — Amsterdam, NL.Tie

EvidenceHunt is ahead on 1 of the 8 rows compared, 1 of them about how well it does the job itself. It is a single row of daylight, so read Connected Papers’s column before deciding.

Overall pick

EvidenceHunt

Scoped to clinical evidence and built with practising clinicians, so the filters match how medical literature is actually appraised.

✓ Scoped to clinical evidence and built with practising clinicians, so the filters match how medical literature is actually appraised. ✓ You need sources you can open and check ✓ It is built for search, research & academics ✓ Basic plan, free: unlimited questions on the low-cost models plus 3 PRO-quality questions, with chat history
Choose Connected Papers instead if…

Builds a similarity graph from citation data rather than from a language model, so nothing in the output is generated and there is nothing to hallucinate.

Connected Papers is the better answer when the job is what it was built for rather than what the pick above does broadly.

✓ Builds a similarity graph from citation data rather than from a language model, so nothing in the output is generated and there is nothing to hallucinate. ✓ You are among students ✓ It is built for search, research & academics ✓ Free plan at $0: 5 graphs a month, with all features included

How we know

Every row that separated these two, and where it came from. Nothing here is a hands-on test — if a line rests on a vendor’s own pricing page, it says so and links it.

The 1 row that decided this page, with the source for each.
RowFavoursWeightWhere it came from
Sources you can checkEvidenceHuntHow well it does the jobFrom this site’s own catalogue record for each product — compiled by hand, not imported. How a product gets listed

The prices

Connected Papers. Read by hand off connectedpapers.com on 4 September 2026. It is not on the monthly re-check, so confirm there before paying. connectedpapers.com/pricing

EvidenceHunt. Read by hand off evidencehunt.com on 4 September 2026. It is not on the monthly re-check, so confirm there before paying. evidencehunt.com/pricing

The ratings

The category these two share. Search, Research & Academics — both are listed there in the catalogue, and the fit recorded against each listing is a judgement made here, by hand.

The nine-category grid below. Derived from what each product is listed for, by one script, once per build — so the same pair always reads the same. It is a derivation, not a review.

What this is not

Neither product was run side by side to produce this page. Nobody was paid to appear on it and nothing here is ranked by commission.

To put the same question to both and read the answers yourself, run them side by side — that is a live test, and this is not.

Choose based on what you’re doing

All ten categories, including the ones where neither of these is the answer. These ratings are derived from what each product is listed for, not from running it — a rating here is a reading of the record, and the record is linked.

01

General-Purpose AI Assistants

Questions, brainstorming, explanations, everyday tasks, decision-making, general advice.

Connected Papers
Not a good fit
EvidenceHunt
Not a good fit
Best choice: Neither
02

Search, Research & Academics

Web research, deep research, books, academic papers, citations, news, fact-checking.

Connected Papers
Built for this
EvidenceHunt
Built for this
Best choice: Tie
03

Writing, Communication & Language

Emails, reports, essays, editing, summarizing, translation, presentations.

Connected Papers
Not a good fit
EvidenceHunt
Not a good fit
Best choice: Neither
04

Coding, Data & Technical Work

Programming, debugging, data analysis, spreadsheets, math, engineering, technical research.

Connected Papers
Bad fit
EvidenceHunt
Bad fit
Best choice: Neither
05

Business, Finance & Professional Work

Business strategy, investing, market research, legal, sales, HR, accounting, consulting.

Connected Papers
Not a good fit
EvidenceHunt
Not a good fit
Best choice: Neither
06

Image & Design

Image generation, photo editing, logos, graphics, product design, advertising creatives.

Connected Papers
Bad fit
EvidenceHunt
Bad fit
Best choice: Neither
07

Video

Video generation and editing, clipping, subtitles, avatars, animation and motion capture.

Connected Papers
Bad fit
EvidenceHunt
Bad fit
Best choice: Neither
08

Audio, Voice & Music

Voice generation, transcription, music, dubbing, sound cleanup and podcast production.

Connected Papers
Bad fit
EvidenceHunt
Bad fit
Best choice: Neither
09

Marketing & Content Creation

Social media, SEO, advertising, copywriting, content ideas, scripts, brand development.

Connected Papers
Bad fit
EvidenceHunt
Bad fit
Best choice: Neither
10

Productivity, Automation & Personal Life

AI agents, workflows, scheduling, meetings, organization, shopping, travel, personal finance.

Connected Papers
Not a good fit
EvidenceHunt
Not a good fit
Best choice: Neither
Pick Connected Papers if

Builds a similarity graph from citation data rather than from a language model, so nothing in the output is generated and there is nothing to hallucinate.

Tel Aviv, IL
Builds a similarity graph from citation data rather than from a language model, so nothing in the output is generated and there is nothing to hallucinate.
You are among students
It is built for search, research & academics
Free plan at $0: 5 graphs a month, with all features included
Pick EvidenceHunt if

Scoped to clinical evidence and built with practising clinicians, so the filters match how medical literature is actually appraised.

Amsterdam, NL
Scoped to clinical evidence and built with practising clinicians, so the filters match how medical literature is actually appraised.
You need sources you can open and check
It is built for search, research & academics
Basic plan, free: unlimited questions on the low-cost models plus 3 PRO-quality questions, with chat history

Pricing, simplified

The plans people actually compare, read from each vendor’s own page.

PricingSimple, up-to-date plan overview.
Connected Papersby Connected Papers
EvidenceHuntby EvidenceHunt
Free version
Connected Papers
Yes — Free plan available5 graphs a month, with all features included
EvidenceHunt
Yes — Free plan availableUnlimited questions on the low-cost models plus 3 PRO-quality questions, with chat history
Individual plans
Connected Papers
Academic $10 / month (quarterly)$6 / month (annual)
Academic Library Custom pricing
EvidenceHunt
Pro —
Business plans
Connected Papers
From $20 / user / month (annual)Academic Group and Business Group
EvidenceHunt
Custom pricingTeam or Organisation
Enterprise
Connected PapersNot published
EvidenceHuntNot published
View full details
Connected PapersView Connected Papers pricing
EvidenceHuntView EvidenceHunt pricing
Interactive

Tell us what you use AI for

Pick your main job and the verdict below changes to match. Every answer is on the page already, so this works as a reader, not a lookup.

The verdict for that job
EvidenceHunt
Close call. Both cover search, research & academics at the same level; both have a free plan you can start on.
8 rows compared

Frequently asked questions

Is Connected Papers or EvidenceHunt better?

EvidenceHunt is ahead on 1 of the 8 rows compared, 1 of them about how well it does the job itself. It is a single row of daylight, so read Connected Papers’s column before deciding. both have a free plan you can start on. Connected Papers: Builds a similarity graph from citation data rather than from a language model, so nothing in the output is generated and there is nothing to hallucinate. EvidenceHunt: Scoped to clinical evidence and built with practising clinicians, so the filters match how medical literature is actually appraised.

Is Connected Papers or EvidenceHunt cheaper?

Only one of the two publishes a ladder we have verified, so a like-for-like comparison is not possible yet.

Do Connected Papers and EvidenceHunt both have free plans?

Yes. Connected Papers: Free plan at $0: 5 graphs a month, with all features included. EvidenceHunt: Basic plan, free: unlimited questions on the low-cost models plus 3 PRO-quality questions, with chat history.

What should I watch out for?

Connected Papers: It finds neighbours of one seed paper, so a bad starting point gives a confidently wrong map. The free tier is 5 graphs a month with every feature included, so paying buys volume rather than capability, and there is no monthly option — billing is annual or quarterly. EvidenceHunt: Medicine only, and no use for research in any other field. It prices in euros rather than dollars, and the free tier gives you 3 PRO-quality questions before dropping you to the low-cost models.

Read more

Connected Papers

What it is for, who makes it, what it costs and what to use instead.

EvidenceHunt

What it is for, who makes it, what it costs and what to use instead.

Best AI for Research

Web research, deep research, books, academic papers, citations, news, fact-checking.

How we compare AI tools
Every row is generated from the same record the rest of the site is built on, so this page cannot drift from what we say elsewhere. We separate winner, tie and depends rather than forcing each category into a ranking, and we drop rows where both sides say the same thing. A pick is only called an overall pick when it leads on rows about how well the tool does the job; a lead that rests on price or audience alone is labelled as one. Nothing here is a hands-on test — how we know lists the source and date behind every deciding row.