ConsensusFree plan
Paid from
$20 a month
View plans and limitsUpdated 4 September 2026 · Independent comparison
Consensus vs Qwen:
which should you use?
Consensus and Qwen, side by side. Find the one that fits what you need to do.
Find your best fitThe 30-second answer
Consensus is built for search, research & academics.
Qwen reads long documents in a very large context window and works across languages, which suits sources that are not in English.
Pricing, simplified
Start free. Upgrade when you need more.
QwenFree plan
Pricing
No verified ladder yet
View plans and limitsThe 30-second comparison
If you only read one section, make it this one. Rows where both sides say the same thing are left out — the point is where they differ. Where each row came from is listed underneath.
| Category | Consensus | Qwen | Better fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it's built for | Searches published papers and tells you how many of them support a claim, which turns a yes-or-no question into a count you can inspect. | Reads long documents in a very large context window and works across languages, which suits sources that are not in English. | Consensus |
| Fit for search, research & academics | Built for this | Strong fit | Consensus |
| Free plan | Yes. Free plan at $0: basic paper search, 15 Pro messages a month and up to 3 Deep reviews a month, though the same card also describes the free tier as being without AI analysis | Yes. Free to use, weights downloadable | Tie |
| Cheapest way to pay | $20 a month. | No paid tier — it is free. | Qwen |
| What the paid tiers cost |
| No paid tier — it is free. | Tie |
| What to watch out for | The consensus meter reflects the papers it found, not the state of the field. Deep reviews are the metered resource — 3 a month free, 15 on Pro, 200 on Deep — so that is what decides the tier rather than how much you search. | It does not search anything. It reasons over what you give it, so the sources are yours to find and yours to check. | Tie |
| Who it is usually for | researchers, students | General use. | Tie |
| Runs on your own machine | Hosted service only — your material goes to their servers. | Can be run on your own machine, so the material never leaves it. | Qwen |
| Sources you can check | Answers carry sources you can open and check. | Answers arrive without sources attached. | Consensus |
| Made by | Consensus — Boston, US. | Alibaba Qwen — Hangzhou, CN. | Tie |
Consensus is ahead on 3 of the 10 rows compared, 2 of them about how well it does the job itself, against 2 to Qwen. That is a clear lead rather than a tiebreaker.
Consensus
Searches published papers and tells you how many of them support a claim, which turns a yes-or-no question into a count you can inspect.
✓ The job is mainly search, research & academics
✓ Searches published papers and tells you how many of them support a claim, which turns a yes-or-no question into a count you can inspect.
✓ You need sources you can open and check
✓ You are among researchers or students
Reads long documents in a very large context window and works across languages, which suits sources that are not in English.
Qwen is the better answer when the job is what it was built for rather than what the pick above does broadly.
✓ Reads long documents in a very large context window and works across languages, which suits sources that are not in English.
✓ You would rather not take on a subscription at all
✓ The material cannot leave your own machine
✓ Free to use, weights downloadable
How we know
Every row that separated these two, and where it came from. Nothing here is a hands-on test — if a line rests on a vendor’s own pricing page, it says so and links it.
| Row | Favours | Weight | Where it came from |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it's built for | Consensus | How well it does the job | From this site’s own catalogue record for each product — compiled by hand, not imported. How a product gets listed |
| Fit for search, research & academics | Consensus | How well it does the job | Both products are listed under search, research & academics in the catalogue, and this is the fit recorded against each listing. Everything listed under search, research & academics |
| Cheapest way to pay | Qwen | Everything else | From each vendor’s own pricing page. Dates and pages are listed below. |
| Runs on your own machine | Qwen | How well it does the job | From this site’s own catalogue record for each product — compiled by hand, not imported. How a product gets listed |
| Sources you can check | Consensus | How well it does the job | From this site’s own catalogue record for each product — compiled by hand, not imported. How a product gets listed |
The prices
Consensus. Read by hand on 4 September 2026, because Consensus cannot be read automatically: Both consensus.app/pricing/ and the help-centre article return 200 with the plans drawn in JavaScript; the browser step found no amounts either. Runs 16, 17, 19 and 20 all agree. Priced by hand from the in-app upgrade panel, which is where the Individual plans are actually shown; the Team and Enterprise tab is still uncovered. consensus.app/pricing
Qwen. Read by hand off chat.qwen.ai on 4 September 2026. It is not on the monthly re-check, so confirm there before paying. chat.qwen.ai/pricing
The ratings
The category these two share. Search, Research & Academics — both are listed there in the catalogue, and the fit recorded against each listing is a judgement made here, by hand.
The nine-category grid below. Derived from what each product is listed for, by one script, once per build — so the same pair always reads the same. It is a derivation, not a review.
What this is not
Neither product was run side by side to produce this page. Nobody was paid to appear on it and nothing here is ranked by commission.
To put the same question to both and read the answers yourself, run them side by side — that is a live test, and this is not.
Choose based on what you’re doing
All ten categories, including the ones where neither of these is the answer. These ratings are derived from what each product is listed for, not from running it — a rating here is a reading of the record, and the record is linked.
01
General-Purpose AI Assistants
Questions, brainstorming, explanations, everyday tasks, decision-making, general advice.
Consensus
Not a good fitQwen
Good fitBest choice: Qwen
02
Search, Research & Academics
Web research, deep research, books, academic papers, citations, news, fact-checking.
Consensus
Built for thisQwen
Limited fitBest choice: Consensus
03
Writing, Communication & Language
Emails, reports, essays, editing, summarizing, translation, presentations.
Consensus
Not a good fitQwen
Good fitBest choice: Qwen
04
Coding, Data & Technical Work
Programming, debugging, data analysis, spreadsheets, math, engineering, technical research.
Consensus
Bad fitQwen
Limited fitBest choice: Qwen
05
Business, Finance & Professional Work
Business strategy, investing, market research, legal, sales, HR, accounting, consulting.
Consensus
Not a good fitQwen
Limited fitBest choice: Qwen
06
Image & Design
Image generation, photo editing, logos, graphics, product design, advertising creatives.
Consensus
Bad fitQwen
Bad fitBest choice: Neither
07
Video
Video generation and editing, clipping, subtitles, avatars, animation and motion capture.
Consensus
Bad fitQwen
Bad fitBest choice: Neither
08
Audio, Voice & Music
Voice generation, transcription, music, dubbing, sound cleanup and podcast production.
Consensus
Bad fitQwen
Bad fitBest choice: Neither
09
Marketing & Content Creation
Social media, SEO, advertising, copywriting, content ideas, scripts, brand development.
Consensus
Bad fitQwen
Limited fitBest choice: Qwen
10
Productivity, Automation & Personal Life
AI agents, workflows, scheduling, meetings, organization, shopping, travel, personal finance.
Consensus
Not a good fitQwen
Limited fitBest choice: Qwen
Searches published papers and tells you how many of them support a claim, which turns a yes-or-no question into a count you can inspect.
Boston, USThe job is mainly search, research & academics
Searches published papers and tells you how many of them support a claim, which turns a yes-or-no question into a count you can inspect.
You need sources you can open and check
You are among researchers or students
Reads long documents in a very large context window and works across languages, which suits sources that are not in English.
by Alibaba QwenReads long documents in a very large context window and works across languages, which suits sources that are not in English.
You would rather not take on a subscription at all
The material cannot leave your own machine
Free to use, weights downloadable
Pricing, simplified
The plans people actually compare, read from each vendor’s own page.
PricingSimple, up-to-date plan overview.
Free version
Consensus
Yes — Free plan availableBasic paper search, 15 Pro messages a month and up to 3 Deep reviews a month
Qwen
Yes — Free plan availableFree to use, weights downloadable
Individual plans
Consensus
Pro
$20 / month$12 / month (annual)
Deep
$65 / month$45 / month (annual)
QwenFree plan only
Business plans
ConsensusNot sold to teams
QwenNot sold to teams
Enterprise
ConsensusNot published
QwenNot published
Tell us what you use AI for
Pick your main job and the verdict below changes to match. Every answer is on the page already, so this works as a reader, not a lookup.
The verdict for that job
Consensus
Consensus. It is built for search, research & academics; Qwen does it well without it being its focus; both have a free plan you can start on.
10 rows compared
Frequently asked questions
Is Consensus or Qwen better?
Consensus is ahead on 3 of the 10 rows compared, 2 of them about how well it does the job itself, against 2 to Qwen. That is a clear lead rather than a tiebreaker. Consensus is built for search, research & academics; Qwen does it well without it being its focus; both have a free plan you can start on. Consensus: Searches published papers and tells you how many of them support a claim, which turns a yes-or-no question into a count you can inspect. Qwen: Reads long documents in a very large context window and works across languages, which suits sources that are not in English.
Is Consensus or Qwen cheaper?
Only one of the two publishes a ladder we have verified, so a like-for-like comparison is not possible yet.
Do Consensus and Qwen both have free plans?
Yes. Consensus: Free plan at $0: basic paper search, 15 Pro messages a month and up to 3 Deep reviews a month, though the same card also describes the free tier as being without AI analysis. Qwen: Free to use, weights downloadable.
What should I watch out for?
Consensus: The consensus meter reflects the papers it found, not the state of the field. Deep reviews are the metered resource — 3 a month free, 15 on Pro, 200 on Deep — so that is what decides the tier rather than how much you search. Qwen: It does not search anything. It reasons over what you give it, so the sources are yours to find and yours to check.
Read more
Consensus
What it is for, who makes it, what it costs and what to use instead.
Qwen
What it is for, who makes it, what it costs and what to use instead.
Best AI for Research
Web research, deep research, books, academic papers, citations, news, fact-checking.